The full text of this article is available to Plus members only.
For full access to all of our articles, please Join or Log In.
Not a Plus Member?
Photo Detective: Out of Sight
Find a hidden treasure in a family jewel.
 Sometimes, it's not the flawless photograph that compels us to trace an identity; it's the image found accidentally. When Sybil Farmer inherited her grandmother Annie Letitia Harrison Baker Maddock's (1875-1906) jewelry in 1994, she didn't notice the photographic mystery in Maddock's silver locket. Farmer recently cleaned the locket, carefully removing the two portraits of her uncles, and underneath one of the pictures, she discovered this badly damaged photo of a young girl. She's not sure who the girl is and would like to identify her.

Throughout the history of photography — beginning with the daguerreotype in the 1840s and continuing today — people have placed photographs in jewelry. Worn by men, women and children, photographic jewelry lends itself to a variety of settings. Women generally select pins, lockets, rings, bracelets and even coat buttons with matching sets of bracelets, earrings and necklaces. Men favor keywinds (used to wind watches), watch fobs, rings, cufflinks, stickpins and coat buttons.

Queen Victoria popularized photographic jewelry as a symbol of mourning when she wore pieces adorned with Prince Albert's image after his death in 1861. Between 1861 and 1880, photographs appeared in lockets and brooches with swiveling compartments to hold swatches of hair or clothing. (Maddock's locket contained only the three portraits.)

To continue reading this article
Share |
Did you enjoy this article?
Please share it!
Recent Blog Posts »
Recent Articles »

Free Genealogy Downloads

©  F+W All rights reserved.